China Rejects NATO Cases of ‘Systematic Changes’, Justifies its Military Modernization

41
China rejects NATO claims of 'systemic challenges', justifies its military modernization

Brussels, June 15: China Rejects NATO Cases marking Beijing of introducing “foundational challenges,” saying that it addresses “a continuation of the Cold War mindset and alliance legislative issues.”

In a proclamation, a representative for the Chinese mission to the EU said China is focused on a protection strategy “that is cautious in nature,” and its quest for guard and military modernization is “defended, sensible, open and straightforward”, Xinhua detailed. At the principal meeting of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) since 2019, China was key to the conversations. In an explanation, NATO pioneers got down on China’s “decisive conduct” and communicated worries over Beijing’s coercive arrangements, South China Morning Post revealed.

The collusion of 30 European and North American nations, has said that China presents “systematic challenges” and has pledged to counter Beijing’s ascent.

In a news meeting after the highest point’s decision, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said that the body was worried that China was “quickly growing its atomic munititions stockpile, with more warheads and countless refined, modern conveyance frameworks”, just as its military participation with Russia and its “utilization of deception”.

“Nato pioneers approach China to maintain its worldwide responsibilities, and to act capably in the global framework, remembering for space, digital, and oceanic areas, with regards to its part as a significant force,” Stoltenberg said.

As per South China Morning Post, the 79-point explanation dedicated three passages and 10 notices to China.

Responding to NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg’s comments, China said it generally follows the guideline of no-first-utilization of atomic weapons whenever and for any reason and is submitted itself genuinely not to utilize or take steps to utilize atomic weapons against non-atomic weapon states or atomic sans weapon zones.

“I might want to find out if NATO and its part states, which are making progress toward “harmony, security and solidness,” can make a similar responsibility as China?” asked the representative.

(ANI)